14 Oct 2026GS4Topic
Case studies: administrative dilemmas
Previous year questions
3 as set1 · GS4 201820 marks250 words
Rakesh is a responsible district level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a healthcare scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than Rs 1 lakh per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of Rs 1 lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation?
Show the model answerHide the model answer
Rakesh holds the government's trust precisely because he applies rules honestly. The couple's need is real, but this scheme was not written for them, so his task is to help them without breaking that trust.
Options and their merits
Approve the application: It relieves suffering, but it breaks a rule he was trusted to apply and takes money meant for eligible applicants. It also sets a precedent that invites misuse.
Reject it and close the file: It is lawful, but it treats the rule as the end of his duty and leaves a destitute couple without help that exists elsewhere.
Reject under this scheme but find another route: It keeps the rule intact while honouring compassion. This is the right course.
How Rakesh should respond
Explain honestly: He should tell the couple why this scheme cannot cover them, without false hope or a curt refusal.
Connect them to other help: Ayushman Bharat now covers all citizens above seventy. The Rashtriya Arogya Nidhi, the District Red Cross Society and state health schemes can meet incidental costs, and his office should help with the paperwork.
Mobilise local support: Where schemes fall short, he can approach charitable trusts or corporate social responsibility funds, keeping the process transparent.
Report the gap: He should write to the department that criterion (b) excludes poor senior citizens in genuine need, so policy can be reviewed.
Rakesh should neither bend the rule nor hide behind it. Integrity decides what he signs, and compassion decides how far he goes to find another way.
Show how the answer was builtHide how the answer was built
Decode
A single question, how should Rakesh respond, which still expects the student to weigh options before choosing one.
Implicit demand
The trap is to approve out of sympathy. The examiner wants the rule respected and the couple helped, through other legitimate channels.
Architecture
An introduction naming the dilemma, three options briefly weighed, four concrete steps for the chosen option, then a verdict.
Articulation
The steps are practical and named, from schemes to feedback on policy, so the response reads like an officer's plan. Money line: neither bend the rule nor hide behind it.
Show value added materialHide value added material
Routes to help the couple
Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana, extended in 2024 to all citizens aged seventy and above regardless of income.
Rashtriya Arogya Nidhi, which gives financial help to poor patients for treatment of serious illness in government hospitals.
District Red Cross Society and the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund.
Charitable hospitals and corporate social responsibility programmes.
Values at play
Integrity and objectivity in applying eligibility criteria.
Compassion and empathy toward the vulnerable.
Feedback to policy, since an officer who sees a flaw in a rule has a duty to report it.
2 · GS4 202020 marks250 words
Rajesh Kumar is a senior public servant, with a reputation of honesty and forthrightness, currently posted in the Finance Ministry as Head of the Budget Division. His department is presently busy in organising the budgetary support to the states, four of which are due to go to the polls within the financial year. This year's annual budget had allotted 78300 crores for National Housing Scheme (NHS), a centrally sponsored social housing scheme for the weaker sections of society. 775 crores have been drawn for NHS till June. The Ministry of Commerce had long been pursuing a case for setting up a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in a southern state to boost exports. After two years of detailed discussions between the centre and state, the Union Cabinet approved the project in August. Process was initiated to acquire the necessary land. Eighteen months ago, a leading Public Sector Unit (PSU) had projected the need for setting up a large natural gas processing plant in a northern state for the regional gas grid. The required land is already in possession of the PSU. The gas grid is an essential component of the national energy security strategy. After three rounds of global bidding the project was allotted to an MNC, M/s XYZ Hydrocarbons. The first tranche of payment to the MNC is scheduled to be made in December. Finance Ministry was asked for a timely allocation of an additional 6000 crores for these two developmental projects. It was decided to recommend re-appropriation of this entire amount from the NHS allocation. The file was forwarded to Budget Department for their comments and further processing. On studying the case file, Rajesh Kumar realized that this re-appropriation may cause inordinate delay in the execution of NHS, a project much publicized in the rallies of senior politicians. Correspondingly, non-availability of finances would cause financial loss in the SEZ and national embarrassment due to delayed payment in an international project. Rajesh Kumar discussed the matter with his seniors. He was conveyed that this politically sensitive situation needs to be processed immediately. Rajesh Kumar realized that diversion of funds from NHS could raise difficult questions for the government in the Parliament. Discuss the following with reference to this case: Ethical issues involved in re-appropriation of funds from a welfare project to the developmental projects. Given the need for proper utilization of public funds, discuss the options available to Rajesh Kumar. Is resigning a worthy option?
Show the model answerHide the model answer
Ethical issues
Welfare against development: Housing for the poor and national energy security are both public goods, but taking from the weakest to pay for the strong needs a strong justification.
Political expediency: The pressure to process immediately before elections risks putting appearance above need.
Accountability to Parliament: Parliament voted the money for housing, so a large diversion without its knowledge weakens legislative control of the purse.
Options available
Process as directed: Quick and obedient, but it may delay housing for the poor and he would sign advice he does not believe.
Refuse outright: Principled but rigid, and it leaves two genuine national commitments unfunded.
Give honest, reasoned advice: Only 775 of 78,300 crores was drawn by June, so a smaller, temporary reappropriation may not harm housing this year. He can propose that, a supplementary demand to Parliament, or an advance from the Contingency Fund of India, with housing restored before its peak spending months. He should record this on file.
Is resigning worthy?
No. His duty is to advise frankly and let elected authority decide, and recording dissent discharges it. Resignation would remove an honest voice and would be justified only if he were ordered to act illegally.
An honest officer's strength lies in the note he writes, not in the post he leaves.
Show how the answer was builtHide how the answer was built
Decode
Three separate demands: the ethical issues, the options in light of proper use of public funds, and whether resignation is worthy. Each needs a heading.
Implicit demand
The figure that only 775 of 78,300 crores was drawn by June is the key fact. A strong answer uses it to find a middle path instead of treating the choice as all or nothing.
Architecture
Three ethical issues, three options with the third developed using the drawal figure, a direct answer on resignation, then a verdict.
Articulation
The answer to the third part opens with a plain no and then gives the reason. Money line: an honest officer's strength lies in the note he writes, not in the post he leaves.
Show value added materialHide value added material
Financial instruments
Reappropriation, which moves savings between units of appropriation within the same grant, subject to the General Financial Rules.
Supplementary demands for grants under Article 115, which seek Parliament's approval for additional spending.
The Contingency Fund of India under Article 267, which allows advances for urgent unforeseen spending pending Parliament's approval.
Concepts to use
Legislative control over the purse, the principle that the executive spends only what Parliament authorises.
Frank and fearless advice as a core duty of the civil service.
Voice, exit and loyalty, Albert Hirschman's framework for choosing between speaking up and leaving.
3 · GS4 202120 marks250 words
Sunil is a young civil servant and has a reputation for his competence, integrity, dedication and relentness pursuit of difficult and onerous jobs. Considering his profile, he was picked up by his bosses to handle a very challenging and sensitive assignment. He was posted in a tribal dominated district notorious for illegal sand mining. Excavating sand from river belt and transporting through trucks and selling them in black market was rampant. This illegal sand mining mafia was operating with the support of local functionaries and tribal musclemen who in turn were bribing selected poor tribals and had kept the tribals under fear and intimidation. Sunil being a sharp and energetic officer immediately grasped the ground realities and the modus operandi followed by the mafia through their devious and dubious mechanism. On making inquiries, he gathered that some of their own office employees are in hand and glove with them and have developed close unholy nexus. Sunil initiated stringent action against them and started conducting raids on their illegal operations of movement of trucks filled with sand. The mafia got rattled as not many officers in the past had taken such strong steps against the mafia. Some of the office employees who were allegedly close to mafia informed them that the officer is determined to clean up the mafia's illegal sand mining operations in that district and may cause them irrepairable damage. The mafia turned hostile and launched counter-offensive. The tribal musclemen and mafia started threatening him with dire consequences. His family (wife and old mother) were stalked and were under virtual surveillance and thus causing mental torture, agony and stress to all of them. The matter assumed serious proportions when a muscleman came to his office and threatened him to stop raids, etc., otherwise, his fate will not be different than some of his predecessors (ten years back one officer was killed by the mafia). (a) Identify the different options available to Sunil in attending to this situation. (b) Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you. (c) Which of the above, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Sunil to adopt and why?
Show the model answerHide the model answer
(a) and (b) Options and their evaluation
Slow down or seek a transfer: It protects his family, but it rewards intimidation, abandons the tribals to the mafia, and tells the next officer that threats work.
Continue raids alone as before: It shows courage, but it makes him the single target, exposes his family, and the operation dies with his posting.
Reach an understanding with the mafia: It buys peace at the cost of his integrity and the law, and is not an option an honest officer can take.
Continue, but make enforcement institutional: It keeps the drive alive while spreading the risk, and is the most sustainable choice.
(c) The most appropriate course
Secure his family and report the threat: File a complaint about the threat, inform his superiors in writing, and seek police protection for his home.
Clean his own office: Act against the employees leaking information, and keep raid plans to a small trusted team.
Depersonalise enforcement: Global positioning tracking of trucks, electronic transit passes and drone surveys make the system, not one officer, the obstacle.
Bring the tribals in: Working through gram sabhas under the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 frees them from fear and turns the community into an ally.
Build a joint task force: Revenue, police, mining and forest officials acting together are harder to threaten than one.
Courage does not mean standing alone. Sunil serves the district best by making the fight against the mafia outlast his own posting.
Show how the answer was builtHide how the answer was built
Decode
Three parts: identify options, critically evaluate each, and choose one with reasons. Parts (a) and (b) are combined so each option is evaluated where it is named.
Implicit demand
The examiner wants a choice that is both brave and safe, which means institutionalising the drive rather than either retreating or acting alone.
Architecture
Four options each weighed in one sentence, then the chosen course broken into five concrete steps, then a verdict.
Articulation
The fourth option is set up in part (b) and developed in part (c), so the answer builds toward its choice. Money line: courage does not mean standing alone.
Show value added materialHide value added material
Tools and laws
The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and the Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016.
The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, which gives gram sabhas a say over minor minerals in scheduled areas.
Technology based monitoring such as tracking of vehicles and electronic transit permits, used by several states.
Values at play
Moral courage and dedication to duty.
Duty of care toward one's own family, which is legitimate and must be met through protection, not retreat.
Empathy for tribals coerced by the mafia, who are victims rather than offenders.