First Principles IASlearning from first principles

First Principles IAS · Current affairs

Everything filed · Environment and Disaster Management › Environmental law and institutions › Forest laws and forest rights

Printed on · firstprinciplesias.com/current-affairs

Environment and Disaster Management › Environmental law and institutions

हिन्दी — Read in Hindi

Forest laws and forest rights

The Indian Forest Act, the definition of forest, the gram sabha and minor forest produce. Prelims has asked who initiates the recognition of forest rights and which ministry is nodal for the Act.

Foundation note: Wildlife and forest laws

The Agasthyamalai evictions

Copy link to The Agasthyamalai evictions

Prelims and Mains

The Agasthyamalai landscape of Tamil Nadu covers the Kalakad Mundanthurai and Srivilliputhur Megamalai tiger reserves and the Kanyakumari Wildlife Sanctuary, and lies within the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve.

  • An encroacher and a recognised rights holder can be standing on the same patch of forest, and an order to clear one of them reaches the other.
  • The Central Empowered Committee is the body the Supreme Court set up to examine forest and wildlife matters and report to it.

What changed

  1. 11 Aug 2026New

    • The Supreme Court ordered time bound eviction of encroachments across the landscape on a Central Empowered Committee report, and barred fresh diversion of forest land there until they are cleared.
    • Among the encroachers were 118 serving or retired government employees.
    • Critics say the notices ignore the Forest Rights Act.

    The Hindu, 11 Aug 2026: New Agasthyamalai eviction orders continue to silence Forest Rights Act (opens in a new tab)

UPSC has asked

  • Prelims 2019: which protected areas lie in the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve

Prelims and Mains

Bamboo is botanically a grass, not a tree, and almost everything the law does about it turns on that fact.

  • The Indian Forest Act, 1927 lets a State constitute reserved and protected forests and regulate what is cut from them and carried out.
  • In 2017 bamboo was removed from the Act's definition of a tree, so bamboo grown on non forest land needs no permit to fell or transport.
  • Bamboo standing in forest areas remains regulated.
  • Under the Forest Rights Act bamboo is a minor forest produce, owned by the forest dwellers who collect it.
  • Since the 2017 change, bamboo enterprises and livelihoods on farm grown bamboo have grown, with no further change in law.

What changed

  1. 12 Sep 2026

    • A backgrounder set out where the 2017 change has led: bamboo enterprises and livelihoods on farm grown bamboo, with no further change in law.

    PIB, 12 Sep 2026: From Green Stems to Green Enterprises: How the Traditional Bamboo Resource is Creating New Livelihoods, Enterprises and Opportunities (opens in a new tab)

UPSC has asked

  • Prelims 2019: bamboo under the Indian Forest Act and the Forest Rights Act

Prelims and Mains

Ecotourism facilities inside forests are governed by the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, under which an ecotourism facility inside a forest counted as a non forest use and needed diversion approval.

  • The 2023 amendment placed ecotourism facilities among forestry and conservation activities, so the same construction no longer takes that route.

What changed

  1. 19 Aug 2026Newnewly added

    • The sector has grown from a few crore rupees in two or three reserves in the early 2000s to an estimated $11 billion by 2025.
    • Sharing of revenue with communities rests on convention and not law, and the share passed on differs from State to State.
    • Carrying capacity is set administratively.

    Mains: a change of definition in a statute, and not any project clearance, opened wilderness zones to construction.

    Frontline, 19 Aug 2026: The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act, 2023 reclassified ecotourism facilities as a forestry activity rather than a non-forest use, opening wilderness zones to construction. (opens in a new tab)

Prelims and Mains

Hasdeo Arand in northern Chhattisgarh is one of central India's largest intact forests and overlies coal.

  • A 2021 Wildlife Institute of India assessment recommended that no block beyond those already mined be opened.

What changed

  1. 3 Jul 2026New

    • Environmental clearance was granted on 24 June 2026 for open cast mining in the Kente Extension block in Surguja district of Chhattisgarh, after in principle forest clearance on 9 June.
    • It is the third major block cleared in Hasdeo, against a 2021 Wildlife Institute of India assessment that recommended no further mining there.

    The Indian Express, 3 Jul 2026: A third coal block cleared in the Hasdeo forests, against the recommendation of the Wildlife Institute of India (opens in a new tab)

Mains

Fortress conservation is the protection of wildlife by removing the communities that live in an area.

  • The case against it rests on evidence that some traditional practices, such as mosaic burning, kept habitats in the condition wildlife needs.

What changed

  1. 29 Jul 2026BriefA study of the Soligas of the Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple sanctuary argues that their mosaic burning and small scale cultivation supported herbivores and tigers and held back Lantana camara. The Hindu, 29 Jul 2026: Study draws on Soligas in Karnataka to make case against 'fortress conservation approach' (opens in a new tab)

Voluntary relocation from tiger reserves: Satkosia

Copy link to Voluntary relocation from tiger reserves: Satkosia

Prelims

Voluntary relocation is the moving of a village out of a tiger reserve's core area with the consent of its people, and Satkosia Tiger Reserve in Odisha is the test case.

Wild Life (Protection) Act
  • Section 38V(5): moving a village out of a core or critical tiger habitat must be voluntary
Forest Rights Act
  • Section 4(2): the same relocation must be voluntary
  • Section 4(5): no one is evicted until their claim is recognised and verified
  • The informed consent of the gram sabha is required
The two Acts, from the Press Information Bureau reply of 13 August 2026

What the law requires

  • Two separate laws govern moving a village out of a tiger's core area, and both say the same thing.
  • Section 38V of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 4(2) of the Forest Rights Act, 2006 allow relocation from a critical tiger habitat only after rights are recognised.
  • It must also be shown that coexistence is impossible, and the gram sabha must give its informed consent.
  • The resettlement package was raised from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 15 lakh per family in 2021.
  • A State Level Monitoring Committee and a District Level Implementing Committee oversee it.

Satkosia

  • Satkosia lies on the gorge of the Mahanadi; it had 12 tigers in 2007 and none by 2022.
  • It was the site of India's first inter State tiger reintroduction in 2018, which failed.
  • Villages were relocated from its core in the years around it.

What changed

  1. 21 Aug 2026New

    • Odisha set up a high level committee to find out whether the villages moved out of Satkosia went willingly.
    • It will test compliance with both Acts and the tiger authority's guidelines, and may recommend compensation or the restoration of rights.

    The Hindu, 21 Aug 2026: Odisha forms inquiry committee to examine relocation of villages from tiger habitat (opens in a new tab)